01.27.09

Intercessions

Posted in Father Seraphim Rose, Mary the Mother of God, St. John of San Francisco, St. Mary of Egypt, St. Maximus, prayer, the departed at 11:53 pm by Andrea Elizabeth

bl-seraphim35loFinishing part three (only in the mid 200’s of pages) of the hefty book, Father Seraphim, His Life and Works, inspires me to mark the occasion here. This book, along with the Church of the Nativity Prayer Book and the Holy Trinity Monastery Psalter I purchased at Holy Cross Monastery sat in my lap the whole way home from Pennsylvania while George drove. I did not want to set them on the floor of the car or pack them in the back. I read from each a little bit, but mainly I wanted them close to me. Saint John of San Francisco also feels close through the stories of him in this book as well as through the icons of him both at Holy Cross and more recently, at St. Maximus the Confessor Orthodox Church in Denton, Tx. We attended vigil there last Tuesday night in honor of the Church’s patron Saint, and I didn’t realize I was standing by St. John’s icon on the wall until I’d been there a little while. It was a very welcome surprise.

There are many stories of the intercessions of St. John of San Francisco. stjohnwonderworkerSome have seen him standing at the Cathedral in San Francisco, Joy of All Who Sorrow, which houses his relics, during Liturgy. There was a couple at the Cathedral when we visited two summers ago who had attended the Orthodox school there, and told us how they would avoid walking the most direct way to the school because he would greet all the students on the sidewalk and ask them which Saint was commemorated that day. It was embarrassing not to know. I believe this man of most constant prayer while he was in his earthly body, is a fervent intercessor for the Church in America. I am so glad that St. Maximus Orthodox Church, OCA, venerates him when the OCA does not have him on all their official Saint commemorations. It’s considered too ROCOR I guess, as that was his jurisdiction.

Holy Saint John, pray for us.

Blessed Seraphim, pray for us.

stmary_of_egyptOn another note, I recently purchased the Church of the Nativity’s Canon of St. Andrew CD’s which is a recording of their services the first week of Lent. I have finished the first three CD’s and was very struck by the chanting of the life of St. Mary of Egypt. I believe it includes the whole of St. Sophronius of Jerusalem’s account.

Holy Mother Mary of Egypt pray to God for us.

Most Holy Theotokos, pray to God for us.

joyofallwhosorrow

01.25.09

The Trouble with Pronouns

Posted in Sergius Bulgakov, male/female relationship at 6:08 pm by Andrea Elizabeth

A while back I did a few posts based on Sergius Bolgakov’s The Comforter as explained in a paper by Nadia Delicata, Th.D candidate. A lot of the Bolgakov’s contents are still over my head, and I have no doubt that Ms. Delicata understands him much better than I. However I had taken some exception to her use in her paper of the pronoun “she” when referring to the Holy Spirit, which I understand is not in Father Sergius’ writings. Somehow she found my reference and graced me with the following clarification which includes some interesting points,

“I wanted to clarify that in the article in question, I used the feminine pronoun for the Holy Spirit in line with the Syriac tradition. I might also add that in my native semitic tongue “Spirit” is feminine, so I also wanted to honour my personal religious roots. However, I certainly do not associate the Holy Spirit with the Mother of God, nor with Sophia, (which would be theologically erroneous), nor was my intention to “feminize” the Holy Spirit. Having said that, nor do I believe that it is theologically correct to “masculinize” the Holy Spirit or any other person of the Trinity. Ultimately when speaking of the persons of the Trinity (or of Sophia), neither male nor female pronouns are helpful, but we exist within the limits imposed by our languages, which, of course, colour our “imagination” of God.”

I responded that I need to quit “imagining” God in an anthropomorphic way and be more apophatic about His gender.

01.23.09

Father Seraphim Rose’s Response to “Orthodox” Evolution Theory

Posted in Father Seraphim Rose, Incarnation, St. Maximus, communion, cosmic transfiguration, homeschooling/education at 9:38 am by Andrea Elizabeth

I really appreciated the spiritual elements in Dr. Kalormiros’ article, linked in my last post. The way he explained how God exists outside of time so that the resurrected Christ is the starting point of everything seems revelatory to me. I think he is pretty unique in saying that Christ’s “preIncarnate” OT appearances were his resurrected self, but I like the idea, not that that matters, I hope I am not speculating. This brings up the idea of OT “shadows” prefiguring Christ. As if He was some sort of ghost. Kalormiros states that He existed in His full, eternal self all along. To me this explains the relationships the OT people could have with Him such as Abraham, Moses, and David and all the others listed in Hebrews 11.

Also I liked the way he explained the unity of creation. Everything is made from relatively few atoms, and along similar patterns. A chimpanzee’s DNA is mid 90 something % similar to humans, and one can learn a lot about human internal systems from dissecting a frog or a pig. We even use pig insulin in diabetics. I also liked the way he explained the Holy Spirit’s hovering over the surface of the waters, and how life-giving water is. What I couldn’t get past though, was that one species came from another. He starts this off by saying that a single seed began the process of development in the universe at the beginning. That everything progressed from that one seed to the development of many diverse species in a hierarchical way. I do not want to dismiss hierarchy altogether or fail to acknowledge that humans are higher than apes, but I cannot get passed the notion that a human came out of an ape’s womb. I do not believe God tweaked the DNA of one species in vitro. Genesis explains that each reproduced after its own kind, as Father Seraphim points out in his response to Dr. Kalomiros’ view of evolution (btw the latter’s material is dated 1997 and Fr. Seraphim died in the early 80’s, but the point is well addressed with Patristic sources).

So as for the seed theory, Christ is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end of all things, yet we need St. Maximus’ explanation of the many distinct logoi, created and sustained by the energies of God, yet distinct from His essence to properly understand these things. In the Derrida movie, I remember the part where he is sitting on his back doorstep talking about the diversity of animals and how he opposes classifications into groups and hierarchies. He “celebrates” (if I may use such a liberal word) the unique identity of each creature. One is not a “step” to another. One does not suffer in comparison to another. Yes there is development in the womb with interesting similarities to other creatures, but this can tell us something about the unity of God’s intention amongst all of his creation. At the same time we are not alien from trees. The universe is connected, but for some reason I hesitate to say “as one”. The universe is not a single organism. Perhaps Kalomiros’ refutation of “the universal soul” is helpful here.

Our union with plants and animals causes us to be able to lift up the bread and wine and consume it during the Liturgy as God’s body and blood. The passover lamb was a temporarily sufficient sacrifice. Christ is not ashamed to unite Himself with “lesser” materials, He indeed created them to be deified. Again I think Kalomiros explained that pretty well.

Because of the population issue surrounding Cain, and the idea that a day can mean a thousand years, I am open to the idea that it took a while to fill the earth with land, plants and animals, that a certain natural development occurred so that the earth was prepared to host “more complicated” species. I am also open to the possibility that Adam was one of many men (though maybe he was the first one and others were created a little after, but that’s too speculative. I plead ignorance.), and that the account of his and Eve’s creation is a poetic telling of how God fashioned man and woman. However, I want to stick to the geneologies and ages that are accounted for in the Bible and say that Adam was a particular individual with a particular relationship with God that got messed up. I think Dr. Kalomiros pretty well describes the unity of mankind, and how we share a single nature which simultaneously fell with Adam and was raised again with Christ.

Thanks to “The Ochlophobist” who shared these links (except the Derrida one) to Father Stephen’s “Glory to God for All Things” and “Mind in the Heart” on his thread, “Pantheistic Confusion or the Purely Metaphorical” on “Energetic Procession”, all listed on the left.

01.22.09

He is mindful that we are but dust.

Posted in Resurrection, cosmic transfiguration, homeschooling/education at 8:13 am by Andrea Elizabeth

Homeschooling moms might want to read this Orthodox article posted by Father Stephen on the creation of man and evolution! It’s quite different from anything I’ve read from a Christian or secular source before.

01.19.09

Theophany

Posted in Church Calendar at 10:31 am by Andrea Elizabeth

Since attending the Old Calendar (Julian) Church of the Nativity on the Sunday before their Christmas (NC Jan. 4), I find that my internal calendar has shifted back 13 days. My musical preference until today has been the Old Calendar Hermitage of the Holy Cross’ Nativity CD, “Christ is Born!”. And maybe because we were still traveling when our Church had it’s Theophany commemorations (NC Jan 6), I have been looking forward to Theophany which feels like it should be today. I have added the Holy Trinity Russian Orthodox Church Old Calendar link under Clergy sites, which gives a pretty long explanation of the feast. Here’s an excerpt:

On the feastday of the Baptism of Christ, Holy Church asserts our faith in the mystery – most sublime and incomprehensible to human intellect – of the Three Persons of the One God. It teaches us to confess and glorify as equally-honoured the Holy Trinity One-Essence and Undivided. It exposes and collapses the fallacies of the ancient pseudo-teachings, which attempted with reason and by human terms to explain the Creator of the world. The Church shews the necessity of Baptism for believers in Christ, and it inspires for us a sense of deep gratitude for the Illumination and Purification of our sinful nature. The Church teaches that our salvation and cleansing from sin is possible only by the power of the grace of the Holy Spirit, wherefore it is necessary to preserve worthily these gifts of the grace of holy Baptism – keeping clean this priceless garb, about which the feast of the Baptism tells us: “As many as have been baptised into Christ, have put on Christ” (Gal. 3:27).

(Then from the Discourse on the Day of the Baptism of Christ of Sainted John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople)

…it is necessary to say that there is not one Theophany, but two: the one actual, which already has occurred, and the second in future, which will happen with glory at the end of the world. About this one and about the other you will hear today from Paul, who in conversing with Titus, speaks thus about the present: “The grace of God hath revealed itself, having saved all mankind, decreeing, that we reject iniquity and worldly desires, and dwell in the present age in prudence and in righteousness and piety”, – and about the future: “awaiting the blessed hope and glorious appearance of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ” (Tit. 2: 11-13).

The site mentions that it is traditional to baptize catechumens during Vespers the night before Theophany, and indeed our parish received the newly illumined John by Chrismation yesterday, but before Sunday Liturgy. I do not know if our Priest had this in mind when it was scheduled, but still I find it very timely, even though our parish is new calendar (Gregorian).

When Thou, O Lord, wast baptized in the Jordan,
The worship of the Trinity was made manifest;
For, the voice of the Father bare witness unto Thee,
Calling Thee His beloved Son;

And the Spirit in the form of a dove
Confirmed the certainty of His word.
O Christ our God, Who hast appeared and enlightened the worlds,
Glory be to Thee!

01.17.09

On the Denial of Self and the Cleansing of the Heart

Posted in asceticism, free will at 5:54 pm by Andrea Elizabeth

- Naked, small and helpless, you now pass on to the most difficult of all human tasks; to conquer your own selfish desires. Ultimately it is just this “self-persecution” on which your warfare depends, for as long as your selfish will rules, you cannot pray to the Lord with a pure heart: Thy will be done. If you cannot get rid of your own greatness, neither can you lay yourself open for real greatness. If you cling to your own freedom, you cannot share in true freedom, where only one will reigns.

The saint’s deep secret is this: do not seek freedom, and freedom will be given you.

The earth brings forth thorns and thistles, it is said. By the sweat of his brow, with anguish shall man till it; it is he himself, his own substance. The holy Fathers counsel is to begin with small things, for, says Ephraim the Syrian, how can you put out a great fire before you have learned to quench a small one? If you wish to set yourself free from a great suffering, crush the small desires, say the holy Fathers. Do not suppose that the one can be separated from the others; they all hang together like a long chain or a net.

Thus it does not pay to come to grips with the hard-to-master great vices and bad habits you have acquired without at the same time overcoming your small “innocent” weaknesses: your taste for sweets, your urge to talk, your curiosity, your meddling. For, finally, all our desires, great and small, are built on the same foundation, our unchecked habit of satisfying only our own will.

It is the life of our will that is destroyed. Since the Fall the will has been running errands exclusively for its own ego. For this reason our warfare is directed against the life of self-will as such. And it should be undertaken without delay or wearying. If you have the urge to ask something, don’t ask! If you have the urge to drink two cups of coffee, drink only one! If you have the urge to look at the clock, don’t look! If you wish to smoke a cigarette, refrain! If you want to go visiting, stay at home!

This is self-persecution; in this way does one silence, with God’s help, ones loud-voiced will.

You are perhaps wondering, is this really necessary? The holy Fathers reply with another question: do you really think you can fill a jar with clean water before the old, dirty water has been emptied out? Or do you wish to receive a beloved guest in a room crammed with old trash and junk? No; he who hopes to see the Lord as He is, purifies himself, says the Apostle John (1 John 3:3).

Thus let us purify our heart! Let us throw out all the dusty trash that is stored there; let us scrub the dirty floor, wash the windows and open them, in order that light and air may come into the room we are preparing as a sanctuary for the Lord. Then let us put on clean garments, so that the old musty smell may not cling to us and we find ourselves thrust out (Luke 13: 28).

May all this be our daily and hourly travail.

In this way we are only doing what the Lord Himself commanded us through His holy Apostle James, who says: Purify your hearts (4:8). And the Apostle Paul instructs us to cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit (2 Cor. 7:1). For from within, says Christ, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and defile the man (Mark 7:21-3). Therefore He also exhorts the Pharisees: cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also (Matt 23:26).

As we now follow instructions to begin with the inside, we must keep in mind that we are not in the least cleansing our heart for our own sake. It is not for our own enjoyment that we furbish and tidy the guest chamber, but in order that the guest may enjoy it. Will He find it pleasant? we ask ourself. Will He stay? Our every thought is for Him.

Then we withdraw and keep in the background and expect no recompense.

There are three kinds of nature in man, as Nicetas Stethatos further explains: the carnal man, who wants to live for his own pleasure, even if it harms others; the natural man, who wants to please both himself and others; and the spiritual man, who wants to please only God, even if it harms himself.

The first is lower than human nature, the second is normal, the third is above nature; it is life in Christ.

Spiritual man thinks spiritually; his hope is sometime to hear the angel’s joy over one sinner that repenteth (Luke 15:10), and that sinner is himself. Such should be your feeling, and in this hope you should labor, for the Lord has bidden us, be perfect even as your father which is in heaven is perfect (Matt 5:48), and to seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness (6:33).

Therefore give yourself no rest, allow yourself no peace until you have slain that part within you that belongs to your carnal nature. Make it your purpose to track down every sign of the beastial within you and persecute it relentlessly. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh (Gal. 5:17).

But if you are fearful of becoming self-righteous from working for your own salvation, or afraid of being overcome by spiritual pride, examine yourself and observe that the person who is afraid of becoming self-righteous suffers from blindness. For he does not see how self-righteous he is.

- Chapter 5 of Way of the Ascetics by Tito Colliander

01.12.09

Masculine Virtues

Posted in male/female relationship at 7:07 pm by Andrea Elizabeth

st-eugenia

We were at the Hermitage of the Holy Cross on the old Calendar December 24th Vespers on which St. Eugenia is commemorated. Thus also another connection with Father Seraphim Rose whose Chrismated name upon entering the Orthodox Church was also his birth name, Eugene. There were extended readings and hymns on the life of St. Eugenia chanted that night and one line in particular caught my attention. I cannot fully remember it, but it was something like ‘you achieved masculine feats of piety’. St. Eugenia disguised herself as a man and entered a male monastery when her parents tried to prevent her conversion to Orthodoxy. I have searched the Prologue of Ohrid and done many internet searches to find the exact commemoration, but have only found those similar to the link above which does not convey the exact thought I’m trying to remember. I did find some references that indicate that the highest virtues are often attributed to the masculine and the vices or lesser virtues to the feminine. Having not studied historical liberal arts in much depth before converting to Orthodoxy, I am surprised at these connotations, though I did grow up with many negative references to femininity. I thought that they were more isolated in origin though. The feminists get all up in arms at this, and I do wonder if prejudice and chauvenism provide this connotation, but the “masculine” women Saints like Eugenia, Catherine, Xenia and Nina don’t seem to be militant against social connotations,in fact St. Eugenia seems to agree with them, but to quietly and resolvedly act as they feel they must. The other reason, besides hiding from her parents and achieving more Christ-likeness, that is given for St. Eugenia’s adopting a male persona was to protect her virginity from would-be suitors and the lustful – see her story to learn how that ended up backfiring on her.

I also looked for the reading on the Hermitage of the Holy Cross’ website and unrelatedly came across this very nice trailer for the dvd on monasticism that Father Sergius gave to us.

01.11.09

David Copperfield and Humility

Posted in Charles Dickens, Others at 11:32 pm by Andrea Elizabeth

A couple of thoughts on David Copperfield now that I have completed it. I think the main theme is what I touched on earlier about sense vs. affection. Happily many of his subsequent characterizations weren’t so dialectically opposed while people were presented as a more complicated mix of good and bad traits. I wont parse this out here, or list further examples of the more extreme saintly or villainous characterizations. I would like to mention that according to Wikipedia, Dickens was an Anglican and was interested in Unitarianism which accounts for his generosity towards most of his characters. His sharp critique of Uriah Heap’s character is valuable notwithstanding. Uriah demonstrates the wrongness of disingenuousness and false humility. With the Orthodox emphasis on humility, I believe such detailed scrutiny of what it should look like is worth consideration. By the way, Uriah was Marvin Jarvis’ best vocal characterization on the audible version we have. The first check that Uriah highlights is that he deems humility as necessary for advancement. Uriah believes people are intimidated by and dislike those who put on airs, so one should seek the lower station at all times. This is not how he ends up getting ahead though. He is an opportunist and a cheat so he advances by people’s being under duress, which he capitalizes on, not by their seeing anything good or attractive in his character. He is able, however, to keep a public persona and imitation of acceptability by his fawning aspect, so in that way it suits his ends.

In thinking about personal humility, one could question if it is being imitated for ultimate gain or to gain entrance into the best places. I want to sit at the head, so I’ll sit at the foot as a surer means to that end than an overt seizing of the highest position. Yet the Bible sort of frames it that way. We are taught that goodness and humility will be rewarded and to strive for that reward. Yet deeming ones self the chiefest of sinners is the goal, so one should actually believe they deserve the foot of the table. A balance must be found between despairingly condemning oneself and being presumptuous. I think being less concerned and conscious of which seat one sits at may be better. But are there good motivations for wanting the head of the table? To be closer to Christ, which His disciples wanted, and to bless others are good goals. The person who can handle attention without it going to their head can be a more prominent icon of Christ, but they would have to be in union with Him to do it.

Dickens seems to hold David up as the model of proper humility. He admits his own good qualities and accomplishments, he loves his neighbor and himself, and he considers what he does to be of some use. It sort of struck me questionable though that all of his friends, who seem inferior to him, are so incredibly glad to see him at each meeting. Maybe that would have better been related in the third person, so it went over better with me when people praised Agnes instead. But one thing that I thought was genuinely humble in how David Copperfield was presented, was that most of the direct help to the people in distress came from other characters instead of him. In that way he exalted the truly humble people who were less than. David’s main contribution, imo, was being the one who was perceptively aware of what was going on and the witness to confidential conversations. Even if someone can’t fix something, caring and being aware help the person going through difficulties not feel so alone in their distress. Everything will eventually be resolved, if not in this life, the one to come anyway, so knowing what people went through on the way to that resolution seems the most valuable and helpful aid one can offer.

01.10.09

A More Serious Part 2 to our Winter Vacation

Posted in Father Seraphim Rose, Mary the Mother of God, Monastics, male/female relationship, personal, prayer at 12:01 am by Andrea Elizabeth

Due to George’s sister’s baby’s baptism being moved up a Sunday earlier, George flew up to Erie on Saturday, Dec. 27th, two days before our six kids and I began our drive up. We already had lodging reservations for our return trip that we did not want to cancel, and felt that extending our trip by driving out on Christmas Day in order to make the baptism would be too stressful on our bank account, Kronk the Bearded Dragon and our friends keeping him, on Pippin the Corgi and the dog boarders, and on ourselves for being gone from home for 15 days instead of 12. Our new plans meant that I would be the sole parent on the way up, but with our eldest being 20 and our second eldest being 18 and a tag-team driver in the eldest’s car, I felt we could manage ok.

It ended up being the most segregated trip we have ever taken. Our van died this past year and we have been going to various places in two cars since then. On this trip, audible books and other paraphernalia made car swapping inconvenient so the boys stayed in theirs and I and my two daughters stayed in ours. Such also were the hotel arrangements of course. We made good time to Jackson, Tenn, crossing the Mississippi River just after dusk. In the flood plains preceding the river in the waning light we saw very interesting patterns of migrating birds in various rippling waves across the sky. Besides the pine trees of East Texas and Western Arkansas, they were the ascetic highlight of the day. Memphis’ city lights reflecting in the moody Mississippi can be tacked on to the next day in Orthodox fashion. The next morning we began our ascent into Tennessee’s Appalachian foothills. We approached Cincinnati after dark that night. I believe that is the most beautiful city at night that I have ever seen. After clearing the hill hiding its proximity, the road signs warn of a steep descent. This descent is into the Ohio River that boarders the city on its southern side. So again you have light framed buildings reflected in a mighty river, but the hills are more dramatic and the bridge leads directly into a tunnel through the hill on the other side. Both cars called each other to express our state of awe.

We drove on through Columbus to get an early start to visit Maxim at the Greek Archdiocese’s Saint Gregory Palamas Monastery between Columbus and Cleveland. We awoke to a newly snow-covered landscape that stayed with us all through the week. We had arranged to be at the monastery for lunch as it was not far out of the way on New Years Eve before we reached our destination at George’s parents’ house in Erie. Father Joseph greeted us very warmly, then we met the scholarly and affable Maxim who was visiting through the holidays. We spoke of Father Seraphim Rose, whose spiritual child, Father Ambrose, had been connected with that monastery. I told him I had brought my book on Father Seraphim’s life by Hieromonk Damascene, and that I had felt there was some sort of connection of his with that place. During the meal he sat with the monks, and the kids and I had a table to ourselves while a monk read a Scripture and a Patristic teaching on Christ’s consubstantiality with the Father, if memory serves. They are on the “New Calendar” by order of the Archdiocese, so we had delicious chicken spaghetti and a green salad with beets and grapefruit. I enjoyed the peacefulness of that meal very much. After visiting a bit longer and being shown the Church, we headed north and east to complete our trip and be reunited with George.

We had a lovely time with George’s parents, brother, two sisters, their spouses, and the passel of cousins, as I have briefly described below. The next Sunday we visited the “Old Believer’s” Church of the Nativity in Erie. I had been somewhat prepared by reading Father John Whiteford’s posts on this same Church when he visited for a conference this past year. I did not have a white head covering so I wore the Russian made black one I bought on the Alaskan Cruise ship last year, and the girls wore other colorful ones that George had bought for me. We stood on the left side of the Church with the other ladies. Though it seemed very reverential, I regretted not being able to see any of the faces of those who stood in front of me. I also noted that there were female readers, that the female choir members outnumbered the men, and there was a woman, maybe the choir director with the men choir members on “their side”. But I can see how having such segregation would engender bonding among the women, and perhaps less attention seeking from men. I was however glad to be reunited with George at the end and to have someone to share the responsibility of our two youngests, who are girls.

Before the service, a kind gentleman allowed me to use his prayer book to help me along. We were there in time for The Hours which were read pretty quickly, so I was glad to read along to catch more of the words. Other than that the service was pretty much the same as our OCA service but with slightly different translations of some words. The chanting was not the four part harmony with Russian music as we have in our parish, but Znamenny Chant, which is “a Russian refinement of the Byzantine neumatic musical notation”. It sounded pretty foreign and a little “moany” to my untrained ears, but at one point midway through the service, a soloist sang in a very gentle, light way that caused the whole Church to listen with increased stillness and silence. It was a special moment.

After the service, Father Simon very warmly welcomed us and explained how the Old Rite had separated from the Church in Russia when Peter the Great introduced western innovations into some of the practices, including the adopting of the New Calendar. (By the way, they were still in the Nativity Season so it was nice not to leave Christmas so soon since we had to leave home so close after it.) He went on to say that some of the Old Believers during the time of the separation were too fanatical about form, but if you want to know how Orthodoxy was practiced from the Baptism of Russia in 988 until the 17th Century, they had preserved it. He showed us how they hold up different fingers when making the Sign of the Cross and the different style of his prayer rope which Father John depicts in his blog linked above. When I asked him to please return the prayer book to the kind gentleman, he said I could keep it. I treasure The Prayers in their words.

We had to pack and get on the road, so we didn’t stay for coffee hour, but related that we hoped to on our next visit which we agreed would not be soon enough. A family of eight makes a nice addition to a small Orthodox parish. I wonder sadly though how long we will be a family of eight with three of our sons off to college and then God knows where.

After a prolonged meal with George’s dear family and sad goodbyes, we departed south in the rain which by the time we reached West Virginia, had completely melted the snow. Farewell winter! We stayed in a town just over the border and next morning made our way to Holy Cross Hermitage , a Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia monastery for Vespers in Wayne, W.V. We called on the way over and were told that the monks eat at 4:30 before Vespers. We arrived at 5pm in order to get settled before the service and were greeted by Father Sergius who handles guest relations. We asked him to please go ahead and eat his dinner, but he insisted on giving us a tour anyway. Both monasteries were nicely rustic, but Holy Cross has a more secluded feel due to its isolation, closer hills, and taller trees. We were there two days before their Calendar Christmas, so we enjoyed an augmented Vespers and Matins with Nativity Hymns. We have their Nativity CD which is sung in English in Byzantine chant as are their services. It was nicer in person. Microphones somehow decrease my enjoyment of Orthodox music. The emphasis changes from a space being filled with praise, to the soloist themselves. I much prefer the former.During this service the women were separated from the men and wore head coverings as well. There is a nun who lives on the premises and another frequently visiting lady, so the girls and I followed what they did and made up the end of the line behind them to the venerate the icons and get blessed by their three priests. It was a lovely candlelight service and I had never been in such a line that venerated every icon around the whole Church. The one of St. John of San Francisco stood out to me the most.

After the service, Father Sergius gave us each a homemade cross from the Holy Land, a piece of frankincense – he had earlier showed us how it is made into incense – and a picture of the Port Arthur icon depicting how the Theotokos had intervened in the Russian war with Japan. We received a blessing from the Abbot, Father Seraphim, and went on our way to the lovely Pipestem State Park with their woodsy mountain cottage, which accomodates eight people, and stayed the next two rainy nights and a day before returning home again by way of Jackson, Tennessee. Another chronological sidestep, my third in this post I believe: after leaving Pipestem Wednesday morning covered by a clearing but windy sky, through two mountain tunnels, John Denver sent me on my way with Country Roads and Sweet Surrender.

So that is how I came to appreciate head coverings, standing with women, and Byzantine Chant.

01.09.09

I Am Back

Posted in Charles Dickens, male/female relationship, personal, writing at 7:30 am by Andrea Elizabeth

Hello again, Dear Reader. It is indeed good to be home. Please pardon the coyness of my last post, but I was at a loss as to how write about being gone without putting our house and home in jeopardy by publicly declaring, or at least implying it empty of human guardianship for almost two weeks. There is a paper trail that despite my best intentions of concealing it, could lead someone of ill-intentions to our home address.

At the outset of this post, let me say that the last three days of driving across the country accompanied almost exclusively by a delightful audible version of David Copperfield has not left me unaffected. I regret to say that despite an ardent determination to complete the tale upon our arrival to this humble abode, 30 minutes remain unheard and will have to wait until errands are run today. But writing will not have to wait any longer! I have in my mind composed many versions of the goings on of the last few days and I have no doubt that what will actually be set forth in this account will differ significantly, as what I post is usually unpredictable to me if not to you.

I will attempt to be chronological, but a couple of themes have also presented themselves to me in a priatorial light. Finding secrets very difficult to keep concealed, including the obviousness of my taking a trip, my attempts notwithstanding, I will go ahead and spill the proverbial beans ahead of time by saying I now prefer head coverings, male-female segregation in Church, and shocker of shockers, if not to you but to me, is my acquiring a taste for Byzantine Chant and Draft Dark Beer! But you can’t stand beer, you may say. I know! I have barely been able to let the least little sip of it pass my lips my whole entire life! I have tried many brands and types, even Guinness Extra Stout, but have felt they all tasted like carbonated dish water. Sweetened wine coolers have been tolerable to me since my early adult days, and more recently Sangria, Zinfandel, dessert wines and Port have been emptied from my glass at restaurants, and most recently dry wine and Vodka mixed with Seven-Up have found their place in my repertoire. But the unpalatability of Beer was maintained right through New Years Eve at my gracious brother-and sister-in-law’s (brother and sister’s-in-law?) house when I turned up my nose after a sip of Bud Light and returned to my delicious Seagram’s Margarita wine cooler. I need also mention that the nightly whiskey shots begun that night grew substantially on me, but I file that under Vodka which is a completely different story that I wont divert to now. All this to say that maybe it was the warm cozy company and the atmosphere of the Ski Lodge at the Peek’n Peak after a lovely time of snow tubing provided by another gracious sister-in-law that did the trick. Thawing out over pizza and draft beer (graciously provided by yet another sister-and brother-in-law) while watching out the huge wall window while the skiers descended the very nearby slope in the dark was what it took to get me to relax enough to let go of my prejudiced inhibitions and enjoy the best that genre has to offer. I do not know if I’ll take to the can after this, but maybe I’ll be able to get past the first sip.

I was going to be chronological, but now feel I should leave the rest to a future post(s).